Analysis on the Growth of Bureaucracy in the United States Essay

There are two main limitations on the growth of bureaucracy. The first is management attitudes and philosophy and the second the pressure of rapid change. These help to explain why even large organizations differ in the extent of their bureaucracy. Numerous debates has commenced in the light of defining the adept political situation of the country. There had been multifarious deliberations as to whether the system of government of the U. S. is formidably working or on what extent has it developed for that instance. Demands for equality of treatment have been one of the reasons for the growth of bureaucracy (Miroff, Seidelman and Swanstrom). The strength of the demand is influenced by the ideology prevailing at that time and place. It is less strong in United States than it was before tackling on the political stability and in the economic landscape as well. Citizens want equality of treatment from the civil service, and questions in the House try to ensure that they get it, thereby putting pressure on civil servants to administer strictly in accordance with the rules, so that no questions will be asked. Employees, through their union, strive for the acceptance of rules to ensure that management cannot discriminate between individuals at its own discretion (Carter). Further, when fairness is identified with equality of treatment, variations in the conditions of work within one large organization are likely to be challenged as unfair. If rules and procedures that are demonstrably fair by this standard are to be devised, little or no allowance can be made for local difficulties and preferences. The increasing realization of the limitations imposed by equality of treatment has led to the idea of a menu of the contents of a reward package from which employees can make choices to suit their own needs and interests. The system of government develops in accordance to the â€Å"situation† of the country, hence, the United States, has strictly followed a structure which adheres to the customs, the internal and external rationales, the cultures which in point of fact reside in the country, and the extent of need. Consequently, bureaucracy in the U. S. has developed because it is more efficient than other forms of organization. It makes for rational and continuing administration. The increasing size and complexity of organizations encourage the growth of bureaucracy. So does the demand for equality of treatment. Rapid change limits the growth of bureaucracy because a more flexible organization is needed to adapt to it, hence some argue that bureaucracy is out of date.